Friday, December 28, 2007

Two plus two equals a 17 foot wall

By Capt. Fogg

“We ought to have an immediate, very clear monitoring of our borders and particularly to make sure if there’s any unusual activity of Pakistanis coming into the country.”

Said Mike Huckabee here in Florida last night. He repeated the theme today in Iowa:

“When I say single them out I am making the observation that we have more Pakistani illegals coming across our border than all other nationalities except those immediately south of the border,”

The fact that this isn't close to being true is less amazing than the sheer irrationality of his non-sequiturs.

“The fact is that the immigration issue is not so much about people coming to pick lettuce or make beds, it’s about someone coming with a shoulder-fired missile,”

Sure, it is, only it hasn't happened nor has it been made more likely by an assassination in Pakistan any more than the assassination of President Kennedy made it more likely for Texans to sneak into Mexico carrying rockets. The fact that the Huckster thinks Afghanistan is east of Pakistan and confuses migrant fruit pickers with Islamic extremists from Waziristan, is only a small part of the evidence that the man has no idea what he is talking about but has a strong feeling that vague mumblings in an ominous tone will allow him to latch on to the Xenophobic and Nativist gravy train. That's just what we need to represent the United States' interests in the world; a dishonest idiot who thinks Jesus wants him in power and will do the thinking for him. Come to think of it, that's what we have been saddled with for these last seven years of bad luck, and that's what we customarily vote for.

(Cross-posted from Human Voices.)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

6 Comments:

  • Maybe he's thinking ahead about how to use those southern detention centers Halliburton was contracted to build. Huckabee is the very definition of a dangerous idiot.

    By Blogger Edward Copeland, at 4:50 PM  

  • He is. He has the kind of brain that equates Mexicans with Pakistani fundamentalists because they're not like us and since terrorists aren't like us either, they must all be terrorists and therefore we need to bomb Mexico. All very logical.

    But hey - Jesus wants him to win, so who am I to argue?

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 11:07 PM  

  • Interestingly, with the exception of your last sentence, I've been hearing pretty much the same sentiments expressed across most of the conservative blogosphere. Even the social cons can't figure out where the hell Huckabee's surge is really coming from -- and most of the evangelicals who are willing to defend his religious views aren't actually going to vote for him. Political conservatives, of course, wonder why he's even running as a Republican.

    By Blogger JM Hanes, at 12:54 AM  

  • I take this as very encouraging news actually, but as to Bush being a conservative or someone of cautious wisdom - I have to stick by my guns. Our country seems to have a fondness for losers with base instincts. I can't figure out why Bush is a Republican either unless Republican has come to mean reckless, lawless and supportive Big, powerful, central and authoritative government. Even I am not cynical enough to think that's what conservatism means.

    Our entire pantheon of "front runners" seems to be media chosen and Huckabee seems to make for good press. I think the best of both parties have been relegated to second or third tier status to the detriment of us all.

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 8:59 AM  

  • Between the war in Iraq and abortion issues, political ideology has been distorted beyond recognition almost across the board. There is nothing politically conservative about the pro-life, socially conservative agenda, and Huckabee throws that contradiction into high relief. In similar fashion, the newly protectionist realpolitik emanating from the left seems almost antithetical to traditional liberal principles.

    At this point, if I had to distinguish between the two parties I'd say that Democrats are a coalition of disparate interest groups and Republicans are a coalition of disparate ideologies. The first generally see central government as the answer, the second, notwithstanding some notable exceptions, still see central government as the problem. While Bush is certainly something of an anomoly, I'd suggest that he ultimately stands less for authoritative central government than for an authoratative executive branch.

    By Blogger JM Hanes, at 1:21 PM  

  • By Blogger mirckeyfi, at 2:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home